Skip to content

Conversation

@Chisanan232
Copy link
Owner

Target

  • Rule and rename all the reusable workflows.

Effecting Scope

  • All the usage of reusable workflows. Please check other projects which reuse these.

Description

  • Rule the naming of reusable workflow it should be start as rw_ which means abbreviation of reusable workflow.
  • Rename the reusable workflow to be more simple and clear.
  • Update README.

…t must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…ut it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…ng about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…n the naming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
… the naming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…aming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…aming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…aming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
…the naming about it must to start with *rw_* if it's reusable workflow.
@Chisanan232 Chisanan232 added 🔍 enhancement New feature or request 🤖 ci/cd Anything modification relative with CI/CD processes. labels Oct 30, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (773abad) 66.66% compared to head (1758cf6) 66.66%.
Report is 11 commits behind head on release.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           release      #50   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    66.66%   66.66%           
========================================
  Files            2        2           
  Lines            3        3           
========================================
  Hits             2        2           
  Misses           1        1           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 66.66% <ø> (ø)
unit 66.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 30, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6686862394

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 66.667%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6683629260: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2
Relevant Lines: 3

💛 - Coveralls

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@Chisanan232 Chisanan232 merged commit 0059352 into release Oct 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🤖 ci/cd Anything modification relative with CI/CD processes. 🔍 enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants